Coronavirus Diary

Today is Monday, December 11, 2023. Today special counsel Jack Smith, the man charged with taking down a potential dictator, Donald J. Trump, for criminal charges in a courtroom in Washington, D.C. under the aegis of District Judge Tanya Chutkan, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to fast-track Chump’s appeal to declare him immune from prosecution so he can escape going to jail if he’s convicted of the various charges against him. This new development in the case against Chump is reported in an online CNN article by Hannah Rabinowitz and Devan Cole entitled “Special counsel goes directly to Supreme Court to resolve whether Trump has immunity from prosecution.”

Thus today Smith took his case directly to the Supreme Court to decide whether Donald Trump has any immunity from criminal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – the first time that the high court will weigh in on the historic prosecution of the former president.

The extraordinary request taken today is an attempt by Smith to keep the election subversion trial – currently scheduled for early March – on track. Smith is asking the Supreme Court to take the rare step of skipping a federal appeals court and quickly decide a fundamental issue of the case against Chump.

Smith’s team has asked the court to review District Judge’s Tanya Chutkan’s ruling that as a former president, Chump is not immune from the election subversion prosecution case brought in Washington, D.C. The Orange Turd’s lawyers have artlessly argued that their client’s alleged actions over the 2020 election results were part of his official duties at the time and therefore he is protected by presidential immunity. The court should reject this specious argument quite handily.

Later today, the conservative court said it will expedite consideration of Smith’s petition to rule on the question of whether Chump deserves immunity. The former president has until December 20 to file a response.

In urging the trial against Trumpilini to begin on March 4, 2024, as scheduled, Smith’s team wrote this to the court, “respondent’s appeal of the ruling rejecting his immunity and related claims, however, suspends the trial of the charges against him, scheduled to begin on March 4, 2024. It is of imperative public importance that respondent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this Court and that respondent’s trial proceed as promptly as possible if his claim of immunity is rejected.”

The special counsel’s team is pointing to a similar maneuver employed in US v Nixon, the 1974 Supreme Court case in which the justices rejected then-President Richard Nixon’s claims of presidential privilege in a subpoena fight over Oval Office tapes. In that case, the high court moved quickly to resolve the matter so that one of the Watergate-era cases could proceed swiftly.

In their appeal to the high court, prosecutors with the special counsel wrote that “nothing could be more vital to our democracy” than holding a former president accountable if they break the law.

Smith’s team wrote, “A cornerstone of our constitutional order is that no person is above the law,” something that Chump has not gotten the message as of yet. They added, “The force of that principle is at its zenith where, as here, a grand jury has accused a former President of committing federal crimes to subvert the peaceful transfer of power to his lawfully elected successor.”

In urging the justices to take up the matter immediately, prosecutors argued that the nature of the high-profile case warranted a departure from normal appellate procedure. Smith’s team recognized that taking the matter through the court of appeals would not result in a “final decision for many months.”

So here we are: almost 50 years later and a special prosecutor is doing the same thing as Watergate prosecutor Leon Jaworski did all those years ago. Like Smith, Jaworksi asked the Supreme Court to let him skip the D.C. U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and take up the issue promptly, otherwise a trial wouldn’t happen until the spring of 1975, he argued.

What ensued in that earlier case is the Supreme Court accepted Jaworksi’s petition and ruled that Nixon did not have executive privilege to avoid the subpoena for the tapes. Within weeks of the ruling, Nixon resigned.

In the later case, we’re not as fortunate as the American public was almost 50 years ago when a criminal president resigned. We still have to place 45 on trial first to prove once and for all that he committed crimes against the federal government.

Now it’s up to the Court to make a final decision here in order to expedite Smith’s March 4 trial date of Donald Chump. Let’s hope they do not provide Chump with more ammunition to delay facing true accountability for the actions he’s engaged in.

In her decision against Chump initially, Chutkan wrote the now-famous line, “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President,” referring to the Orange Hemorrhoid. She thereby harkened back to our nation’s origins to reject Trump’s claim that sweeping executive privilege blocked the January 6 Committee from subpoenaing his presidential records.

I just heard on the Rachel Maddow show tonight that the Supreme Court assented to Jack Smith’s special request to reach a decision in the Chump immunity appeal. And they might do it within a week, I just heard. Very good. There should be no more delays with regard to the former president confronting eventual justice.

Stay safe and be well.

Coronavirus Diary

Today is Saturday, December 9, 2023. The continuing legal difficulties faced by the President’s son, Hunter Biden, were put to the forefront when the Justice Department brought criminal charges against the younger Biden on Thursday, and this could only serve to upend Joe Biden’s inevitable rematch against Donald Chump in 2024. An online CNN article covering this latest embarrassment for the sitting president is written by Kevin Liptak, MJ Lee, and Annie Grayer entitled “Hunter Biden’s latest indictment brings an uncomfortable ordeal to the forefront for his father.”

These additional charges brought against his surviving son amount to an uncomfortable reminder of the personal strain the president will face as he gears up for the coming campaign.

Months after a plea agreement for Hunter Biden collapsed in a Delaware courtroom, reality has set in among Biden’s team that his son’s legal problems – and the ensuing revelations about his lifestyle and struggles with addiction – will stay in the news cycle for months to come as the legal process plays out.

Republicans have relentlessly searched for fodder to damage Biden politically since they have to distract the country from the four, more serious indictments leveled at their Golden Idol and now they have something to make false equivalences between their Dear Leader and the sitting Democratic president. So let’s make no mistake in trying to make comparisons here with charges leveled against Hunter Biden, the son of Joe, and with Donald Chump who is running for president and Hunter, who is not running for president. Therefore, no comparisons should be made here. But repugnicans will try to do so anyway. Biden’s team is confident that voters will make their decision for reasons other than the president’s troubled son.

Still, the unveiling of these new charges does come at an inopportune moment, as the election year looms and Biden’s vulnerabilities are laid bare. His approval ratings have slumped as the American public continues to feel pessimistic – I don’t see why! – about the health of the economy and increasingly question Biden’s handling of the Israeli-Hamas war – a conflict that has been an overwhelming focus for the White House over the last two months.

This week’s tax charges, the second indictment against Hunter Biden this year, include salacious details about how the president’s son was spending money on “drugs, escorts and girlfriends, luxury hotels and rental properties, exotic cars, clothing, and other items of a personal nature” – all while avoiding paying his fair share of taxes. However, many of these details concerning Hunter’s reckless spending were already known, detailed in a candid memoir that tracked his journey through addiction.

In public, Hunter Biden’s representatives argue that their client’s legal troubles have little to do with substance – and everything to do with who his father is. Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, said in a statement Thursday on the heels of the latest indictment, “Based on the facts and the law, if Hunter’s last name was anything other than Biden, the charges in Delaware, and now California, would not have been brought.”

Another possible concern for the president is the public’s growing sense that he had some involvement in Hunter Biden’s business dealings. Are we going to vote in a fascist because of these insubstantial concerns? I can’t believe Americans would reject Biden over Trump who has said he would act like a dictator on Day 1 of his new administration. Maybe Americans prefer to live in a dictatorship this time out, who knows? We’ll find out next November.

As for addressing the claim that he interacted with so many of his son and brother’s business associates, Biden responded, “I did not – they’re lies.” Despite no evidence that Joe Biden benefited from his son’s foreign business dealings, his surface-level interactions involving attending dinners with certain individuals continue to provide fuel to his political adversaries.

Democrats continue to maintain that repugnicans are needlessly moving forward with their impeachment inquiry to help Chump beat Biden in 2024.

Commenting on this move to impeach Biden, the top Democrat on the Oversight panel, Rep. Jamie Raskin, said, “They are completely trivializing and destroying the meaning of impeachment. Impeachment is an extraordinary constitutional remedy that is reserved for high crimes and misdemeanors [which were truly reserved for Donald J. Trump]: grave offenses against the public order. And they obviously don’t have that for Joe Biden, but they want to trivialize it so he can – so Donald Trump can say, ‘Oh well, you know, he’s been impeached twice but there’s also an impeachment investigation going on during the campaign against Joe Biden, and so it’s fraudulent like everything else.'”

Though his father has remained noncommittal about his son’s legal troubles, Hunter Biden has gone on the offensive against ugly repugnicans who have insensitively used his addiction issues for political gain. In a podcast released yesterday, Biden said, “They are trying to, in their most illegitimate way, but rational way, they’re trying to destroy a presidency.” Biden added that repugnicans are “trying to kill me.” Of course, he didn’t mean this literally, but you never know?

So there you have it: news about Hunter Biden’s newest legal entanglements. But don’t forget for a moment how repugnicans will seize upon these indictments in order to snare political advantage for themselves in the bargain. Though these indictments are regrettable, they no way compare to the more severe criminal charges facing the former president. You have to be an idiot to see a similarity between them, in my opinion.

In honor of Chanukah, Elliot and I entertained our third-floor neighbor “Denise” for a meal consisting of latkes and desserts bought at Parisi Bakery, in Astoria, where we had brunch at Sanford’s, right next door. This traditional holiday fare was wonderfully prepared by Elliot around 4 p.m., 90 minutes before Denise was expected to knock on our door. When she did, she brought a kale salad and some vino. As an appetizer, we had hummus with crackers.

Tomorrow we might have to be ensconced indoors if this squall bears down on us as meteorologists have forecasted. So let’s see; the rain I can handle but not winds averaging between 40 to 50 miles per hour. We may have to play Scrabble later in the afternoon.

Have a good Sunday anyway.

Stay safe and be well.