And So It Goes

Today is Thursday, June 26, 2025. Today Elliot and I had a surprisingly disappointing day trying to get Elliot a real ID at the White Plains Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in which his appointed time was 1:45 p.m. We woke up early, say, around 8:15 to prepare to receive our cleaning lady, “Lareto,” who unfortunately called us at 10:15 to say that she was canceling because her son couldn’t drive her. We were going to leave around 10:30 to get to Larchmont to have breakfast, and so we did, Lareto or no Lareto.

It was smooth sailing driving to Larchmont, as we sauntered over the Throgs Neck Bridge and past my old stomping grounds in the Northeast Bronx, Co-op City, which used to be where Freedomland U.S.A., a theme park dedicated to American history, was situated in the Baychester section of the North Bronx. It opened on June 19, 1960, and permanently closed four years later, on September 13, 1964. I have very vague memories of going to Freedomland as a child with my parents before moving there to live in the housing development known as Co-op City which broke ground in 1966.

When we got to Palmer Avenue where the Harbour House Coffee Shop is located, we had to find parking. The only parking we found was linked to some app that I had to download since no meters were functioning. Naturally, I was left to navigate this system, as Elliot just left me to go to the coffee shop. I moved the car first from the street into a lot, thinking I wouldn’t have to use this system, but I was unable to find a snug-enough spot for the car, so I had to find another spot somewhere else. I lucked out with moving into a spot at the end of the block where the coffee shop was across the street. However, I was beginning to have trouble registering the car with this parking app. Fortunately for me, a young man was passing me on the corner, so I accosted him and asked if he could help me download the app properly. He was very courteous and showed me how to do it. And if this young man hadn’t shown up, we might have still been there in Larchmont. Now I was able to join Elliot in the coffee shop.

To make a long story short, we got to White Plains within 24 minutes or so. We were early for Elliot’s appointment at 1:45, so we were told to return five minutes before 1:45. The guard who informed us of this mentioned we could go to Whole Foods around the block and hang out there. Which we did. I got a coffee and a chocolate croissant while Elliot did a little shopping. By 1:30, we returned to the DMV office.

After waiting at least an hour, Elliot was given the red light by one of the clerks who examined all of the documents he brought to verify who he was. She stated he did not have an original Social Security card and that was why she was not proceeding with his application. Huh! Elliot showed the woman other forms of proof of his identity and this was still not enough. In fact, he had a copy of his Social Security card, but that was not accepted. Elliot took this setback rather well; me, I wanted to scream. I should have said something to the clerk behind the window, but I didn’t. Like, “Can’t you let this one pass?” Didn’t he bring you enough forms of identification?” I wanted to proclaim, but I stayed quiet.

Even though you can say we had a pleasant enough drive to White Plains, I considered the whole venture a major disappointment. Now we have to start from Square 1, schedule another appointment somewhere else, and go through with the same waiting. At least Elliot didn’t have to wait as long as I did on Friday, April 4, when I applied in Manhattan for the same thing. Elliot will also have to carry his passport the next time we travel domestically, which will be next month. I expected his new ID to have been mailed to him before this trip. But that was not meant to be!

I wanted to indicate that today, June 26, marks the 10-year anniversary of nationwide marriage equality in the United States. An online article about this milestone appears in Gay City News by Matt Tracy entitled “Report sheds light on 10 years of marriage equality in the United States.”

“Nearly 600,000 same-sex couples have been married in the United States since the landmark 2015 Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, according to a report published by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law.” Here’s another intriguing statistic: “In total, there are now 823,000 married same-sex couples in the United States – twice as many as there were in 2014, just one year before the Obergefell ruling, according to the report.”

Not surprising is the fact that the ruling has had the greatest impact on southern states, “none of which had achieved marriage equality by the time the Obergefell ruling was handed down: From 2014 to 2023, there was a 21% increase in same-sex married couples in the south, compared to 16% in the west, 15% in the midwest, and 11% in the northeast.”

Even though many states have moved to codify marriage equality in recent years, the fate of this precedent is uncertain, especially in these troubling and regressive times under a new fascistic president. The year that the legislation was passed, it was Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas who wrote in a concurring opinion that the Supreme Court “should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” referring to rulings establishing rights to contraception, sodomy, and marriage equality, respectively. Oh, why hasn’t this very corrupt justice been impeached already? I ask.

Voters last year in California, Colorado, and Hawaii became the latest to repeal bans on same-sex marriage, and earlier this month, the Delaware Senate approved legislation to codify same-sex marriage.

“As of June 2025, more than two dozen states still maintained statutes and/or constitutional amendments barring marriage equality – though those policies have been with 433,000 married same-sex couples residing in those states.”

Though today does mark a commemoration of the ruling that brought marriage equality to the United States, there is still a sense that things can change very fast, just like Roe v. Wade was overturned by this “Extreme” Court in June 2022 after observing it for 50 years. We still have to remain very vigilant then.

In the meantime, let’s hope that horrible “murder” bill that the lying sack of shit called Donald Chump laughingly calls his “Big, Beautiful” bill dies before it can ever be passed. But this president wants the bill jammed through very soon so that he could sign it before the Fourth of July. This is only for optics., folks, nothing else.

But the bill is now receiving opposition from the Senate’s rules referee, Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, who struck down key provisions, saying they don’t meet the chamber’s strict budget rules that must be followed so the bill can be approved by a simple majority of 51 votes – or just GOP support. This fact is reported in a CNN online article by Lauren Fox, Manu Raju, and Morgan Rimmer entitled “Trump’s massive agenda bill faces headwinds in the Senate after key ruling from chamber’s rules referee.”

Devastating changes to the Medicaid program have badly divided the Senate GOP, with a number of members – including Josh Hawley (He with the Raised Fist) of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine, among others – worried that the new limits would devastate rural hospitals in their states, just the kind of Dump supporter that would be affected by these changes.

Again, let’s hope this bill goes through various iterations and that certain changes are added to it that will not devastate Americans’ food assistance and Medicaid as it’s originally been conceived. If it does pass with these horrible cuts untouched, repugnicans should then run for the hills in 2026!

Tomorrow Elliot and I are driving to Highland, New York, to visit our friends “Ted” and “Peter.” We are staying until Saturday. So I’ll be absent from this venue until Saturday or Sunday, depending on what time we get home on Saturday.

Have a good Friday then.

And so it went!

And So It Goes

Today is Sunday, November 24, 2024. Here’s an interesting online article about the ripple effects of the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election in which democracy was thrown under the bus by Donald Dump’s stunning victory: the rate of divorce is rising between couples with differing viewpoints on the election. The article is found in BuzzFeed and it’s entitled “‘These People Have Been Unhappy For A Long Time'”: Divorce Lawyers Are Weighing In On If And Why Couples Are Splitting After Donald Trump’s Election Win.”

In the aftermath of the last election, there’s been a lot of talk about family members severing ties or setting new boundaries due to political differences. And it’s not just parents, siblings, and extended family having these fights about maintaining ties. There have been headlines about election-related divorce, too.

Although there is no hard data around the pursuit of divorces since the election of former president Donald Dump, many lawyers have shared anecdotal evidence of an effect.

One of those lawyers is family law attorney Jo Anna C. Parker of Alabama who tweeted on November 9 that 14 potential new clients scheduled divorce consultations in the days following the election – a significant increase compared with her typical workweek and even more notable because November is usually a slow month for new divorce cases, she said.

Another family law attorney, Tiffany Bond of Maine, told HuffPost she was similarly busy fielding intake calls in the week after Dump was reelected.

She remarked about this sudden increase, “I had to send calls to other attorneys because I couldn’t take any more myself. It happened the last time Trump was elected, too.”

Kaylan Gaudio, a family law attorney at Sodoma Law in North Carolina, opines that “Couples with differing political ideologies may find themselves reexamining their compatibility.”

She noted that some women in particular view their partner’s support for president-elect Drumpf as a personal affront and disregard for their rights and values.

“Some women feel that supporting a candidate who wants to eliminate their right to choose what to do with their own body, or the fact that the candidate has been found liable for sexual abuse by a jury coupled with his disrespectful and sexualized rhetoric toward women as unfathomable,” Gaudio said. She added, “A spouse may question their partner’s values and the respect he or she has for women if the individual is willing to support a candidate with this track record.”

A major event like this last election might highlight how much a couple has grown apart over the years. They may have married young before they really knew themselves or each other. Now one or both partners may be demanding the other come into their worldview instead of reflecting on how they can better express their values and connect.

Following the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections, Tiffany Bond heard from women who expressed feeling like their partner does not value them as an equal and as a human being.

She explained, “A lot of these people have been unhappy for a long time.” She added, “There are fundamental incompatibilities that have grown over time. It’s not simply ‘You voted for Trump, so I’m going to divorce you.’ There might be some gloating or celebrating that involves a husband saying offensive things to his wife, which adds to her underlying feeling that he doesn’t respect her. It’s more like the straw that broke the camels’ back, but that camel already had a lot of straw.”

Therefore, this article highlights how the institution of marriage itself may have seen a sea change as a result of Dump’s win on November 5. Spouses have taken a stand and are shouting this to their lawyers, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!” in deference to a most repeated line of dialogue from 1976’s brilliant satire on television, Network.

Thus not only have our faith in institutions have been shaken by Dump’s unexpected election victory, marriages have also come apart at the seams as a result of differing political viewpoints held by the respective spouses.

I can’t wait to see how family dinners proceed under the Thanksgiving turkey this coming holiday season. Massive arguments are certain to arise if political viewpoints become known while watching the traditional football game in the afternoon. Possibly the best way to proceed this coming Thanksgiving is to establish a hard and fast rule from the very beginning: no political discussion anywhere at any time during the family gathering. If anyone breaks this rule, he or she can be banished from the dinner table after the game.

Have a good week.

And so it went!